For the Select Registry connection, ResNexus explained to both parties—including ThinkReservations—the revenue share requirements and other marketing factors required to go live as a ResNexus partner.
As mentioned above, ResNexus permitted ThinkReservations to enter into a separate agreement with ResNexus for their ThinkOrganizations Association product.
ResNexus reasonably assumed that because ThinkReservations was aware of the rollout process with Select Registry, and because ResNexus said the same process was required for the ThinkOrganizations Association product, that ThinkReservations would follow the same process for beta testing and announcing the connection.
ThinkReservations' first association to try their ThinkOrganizations connection with ResNexus was Michigan Bed and Breakfast. When ThinkReservations approached Michigan Bed and Breakfast, they did not communicate many requirements between our connectivity agreement—including pricing and fees.
In fact, it was the worst connectivity partnership rollout ResNexus has ever experienced.
The rate and availability information from Availability Exchange is one-way, meaning that the ResNexus channel manager Availability Exchange sends only ResNexus client information to OTAs such as Select Registry, Spot2Nite, ThinkOrganizations Association product, etc.
ResNexus charges a universal fee of 1% for any bookings that come through Availability Exchange. This keeps our partnership relationships simple and covers our operating costs.
The most egregious error, in our opinion, was that ThinkReservations did not disclose the 1% booking fee billed by ResNexus. This completely changed and complicated the nature of the relationship with ResNexus and any other association using the ThinkOrganizations OTA product.
Instead of being a simple OTA connection that ResNexus could standardly and universally apply the same fee to, ThinkReservations could claim to be the supporter of small associations, while inferring that ResNexus was greedy by charging a 1% fee to cover the cost of our connection.
Because this incident also occurred at the same time that the ResNexus and ThinkReservations
lawsuit was preparing to go to court, ResNexus had trouble determining if this was malicious interference or incompetence not seen by any other OTA partner.
This terrible communication resulted in members of the Michigan Bed and Breakfast Association asking ResNexus to charge nothing because ResNexus is so much larger of a company and should "just support the industry".
The reality is that maintaining Availability Exchange is a constant task, not one-and-done. There are monthly fees for the cloud services it runs on, not to mention development costs. The universal fee that ResNexus charges pays for that development maintenance.
In our opinion, it is ironic that ThinkReservations could charge a smaller state association hundreds of dollars per year for their ThinkOrganizations booking engine, but ResNexus could not charge an individual property that may take an average of $150-300 in bookings per month $1-3 to maintain the connection and stay in business.
In addition, ResNexus offers the same association website services so other more economical options were available to this association as well.
ThinkReservations appeared to not be able to communicate clear requirements that all other previous and current OTA vendors had been able to. The result was that now ThinkReservations and ResNexus had to change the agreement between each other because of yet again, lack of trust and candor.